<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Many Sites vs Few Sites vs One Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrispian.com/48/many-sites-vs-few-sites-vs-one-site/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrispian.com/48/many-sites-vs-few-sites-vs-one-site</link>
	<description>Chrispian.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chrispian</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispian.com/48/many-sites-vs-few-sites-vs-one-site#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrispian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispian.com/48/many-sites-vs-few-sites-vs-one-site#comment-193</guid>
		<description>eBook Giant looks pretty slick. Is that user generated content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eBook Giant looks pretty slick. Is that user generated content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ses5909</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispian.com/48/many-sites-vs-few-sites-vs-one-site#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>ses5909</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrispian.com/48/many-sites-vs-few-sites-vs-one-site#comment-185</guid>
		<description>I completley agree that diversification is key. What I'm trying to do is have some small easy sites that I can throw up without much maintenance at all like http://www.ebookgiant.com but it makes ok money. Nothing to write home about but for a no-maintenance site and no promotion at all, it has treated us well. On the complete other end the spectrum is my &lt;a href="http://www.theblogexperiment.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;blog community&lt;/a&gt;. This site takes a lot of work for me and doesn't produce any kind of return yet. I do have some ways in mind to monetize it, just need to finish them. 

I think your we heart pets would be a great place to start. You already have a lot of content there and with a little face lift and new content, it could be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completley agree that diversification is key. What I&#8217;m trying to do is have some small easy sites that I can throw up without much maintenance at all like <a href="http://www.ebookgiant.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ebookgiant.com</a> but it makes ok money. Nothing to write home about but for a no-maintenance site and no promotion at all, it has treated us well. On the complete other end the spectrum is my <a href="http://www.theblogexperiment.com" rel="nofollow">blog community</a>. This site takes a lot of work for me and doesn&#8217;t produce any kind of return yet. I do have some ways in mind to monetize it, just need to finish them. </p>
<p>I think your we heart pets would be a great place to start. You already have a lot of content there and with a little face lift and new content, it could be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
